Nowodays, a lot of animals live in zoos. Is it right or wrong to keep them in the zoos? The following essay presents some pros and cons of this problem.
First of all, people can see wild, beautiful, exotic animals. They can see how animals live and behave. Secondly, animals have good life conditions in zoos. they do not starve because they have food and water. People take care of animals. Moreover, animals are safe. People do not kill them. Animals live as close to the natural habitat as possible. For instance, water and other natural barrieres are used to separate animals from each other and from the visitors.
On the other hand, keeping animals in zoos is harmful for them. The animals are forced to live in a unnatural habitat. There is not enough living space in the zoos, when often makes animals unhappy and restless. It is also true that, some animals do not proliferate in zoos. Secondly, animlas should live in freedom, because it is their natural haitat. Moreover, animals in the zoos live under stress. The worst thing is that animals in the zoos will never be able to exsist in their natural habitat alone. They have will not any chance to survive.
In conclusion, it seems that keeping wild animals in zoos is more benefical than harmful. I think that it is profitable for all animals, because they have good protection. They can feel safe.
Przydatna praca?TakNieDodaj komentarz
IELTS essay topic
Some people think that man-made Zoos should not exist in the 21st century. Do you agree or disagree?
There are several arguments against confining animals to cages and other small enclosures just for the sake of keeping human visitors entertained. Animal rights activists have always insisted that zoos should be banned. I certainly agree with this view.
It is true that zoos provide education and entertainment. Both children and adults enjoy visiting zoos because they provide an opportunity to see wild animals without having to go the jungle. After all, not everybody can go on an African safari to see lions, rhinoceros or hippopotamuses. But this is hardly a justification for keeping animals in zoos. Man has no right to capture them and imprison them in small enclosures.
Wild animals thrive in the wilderness. Any attempt to remove them from their natural habitat for keeping people entertained is unethical. Instead of building zoos, the government should develop wild life sanctuaries and national parks. The general public interested in seeing animals can go on guided jungle safaris. The thrill that one experiences when one sees a lion or tiger in the jungle cannot be explained in words. Zoos do not provide that kind of excitement or adrenaline rush.
Zoos do not help animals in any way. Yes, there are people who believe that zoos are required to protect endangered animals and birds; however, I don’t think that this argument holds water. When African wild animals are brought to zoos in India or Europe, they have to struggle hard to adapt to the different climate and ecosystem.
To conclude, I certainly agree with the view that zoos should not exist in this century. It is true that they provide some entertainment, but we have absolutely no right to confine animals to small enclosures for our amusement.
- Academic Task 2 (Essay) as seen in Iran
- Protecting wild animals is a waste of resources | Band 8 essay samples
- IELTS writing and speaking test in the UK – January 2012 (academic module)
- Band 9 essay sample: Should mobiles be banned in public places?
- IELTS essay: Some people believe that animals should not be used for profit. Do you agree or disagree
- IELTS Speaking Test in Australia
- IELTS Speaking Test Questions
- IELTS sample essay: Are artists more popular than scientists?
- IELTS sample essay: Should governments provide free internet?